Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35434 (CHH)

JYOTISH KUMAR SALOME v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6654/2026 · 2026-09-09

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 CGHC010345852026 2026:CGHC:39689 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6654 of 2026 1 - Jyotish Kumar Salome S/o Cherka Ram Salome Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Vijayapur Teh Mohala, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 2 - Govind Ram Sahu S/o Thakur Ram Aged About 50 Years R/o Vill. Saror, Teh Gurur Distt. Balod (C.G.) 3 - Kamla D/o Budhram Aged About 26 Years R/o Vill. Pachangi, Post Guruwandi Distt. Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary of Department of Revenue, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Panchayat and Rural Development Department Through Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Panchayat Directorate Through Its Director Panchayat And Rural Development Department New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Labour Commissioner Labour Commissionerate, Block- 3, 2nd Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru) Order on Board ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2026.09.11 10:49:16 +0530 2 / 2 10/09/2026 1. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called once. Even in the second call none appears nor any representation has been made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. In such circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE ashu