17.08.2026 Serial no. 22 Court no.551 (MKP) CRM (A) 2407 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Goghat PS Case No. 376 of 2026 dated 18.06.2026 u/s 115(2)/117(2)/126(2)/3(5)/351(3)/352/76 of the BNS 2023. -And- In the matter of : Jayanti Banerjee And Ors. … Petitioners Mr. Krishan Ray, Ms. Isita Kundu. … for the petitioners Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya, Ld.Srn.,Govt.Adv., Mr. Amartya Mohan Bhattacharyya. … for the State-respondent(s) 1. Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case due to property disputes. The petitioners are the neighbors and distant relatives of the defacto complainant. 2. It is further submitted that there was a collision on the way and thereafter there was an altercation between 2 the parties. Learned advocate prays for the anticipatory bail. 3. Both the parties lodged the case and counterblast case against each other. 4. Learned Senior Government Advocate for the State refers to the statement of witnesses recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS as well as under Section 180 of BNSS. However, the learned Senior Government Advocate for the State fails to draw my attention to any injury report contained in the case diary. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Having heard the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the materials in the case diary, it transpires that there were some disputes between the petitioners and the defacto complainant. It also transpires that the petitioners also lodged a case as against the defacto complainant, in this case, and such case was prior in time to that of this case. The Court is informed that the petitioners have already complied with a notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS, issued by the Investigating agency. 6. In such circumstances, considering the nature of the allegations as well as materials in the case diary, this 3 Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on further condition that petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 8. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Allowed. 9. CRM (A) 2407 of 2026 is disposed of. (Md.Shabbar Rashidi. J)