- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010723882025 NC: 2026:KHC:43219 MFA No. 8238 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8238 OF 2025 (AA) BETWEEN: 1. AMAZON WEB SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956. HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT UNIT NO.1401 TO 1421, INTERNATIONAL TRADE TOWER, NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI 110019 REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR ABHIJIT PANDEY …APPELLANT (BY SRI.DHARMA TEJ, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.ANIND THOMAS.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. OMAPRAKASH N SRINGERI AGE ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O D NAGABHUSHANA R/A 473 16TH MAIN, POORNAPRAGNA LAYOUT, UTTARAHALLI. BENGALURU 560061 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.B.N.ANANTHA NARAYANA., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010723882025 NC: 2026:KHC:43219 MFA No. 8238 of 2025 THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.37(1)(c) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DT. 23.09.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO. III IN O.S.NO.2898/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-12), REJECTING THE I.A.NO. 3 FILED U/S.8 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent are present along with their respective parties. 2. Sri. Abhijith Pandey - authorized signatory of the appellant, who is the defendant and the respondent/plaintiff - Sri.Om Prakash N Singheri, are also present before the court physically, identified by their respective counsels on record. Parties to the proceedings - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010723882025 NC: 2026:KHC:43219 MFA No. 8238 of 2025 were referred to explore the possibility of a settlement by this Court vide order dated 19.06.2026. Accordingly, they were sent to the Karnataka Mediation Centre, Bengaluru. In the process, parties have amicably resolved the dispute by entering into a Memorandum of Settlement under Section 89 of CPC read with Rules 24 and 25 of the Karnataka Civil Procedure (Mediation) Rules, 2005. 3. The Mediation Settlement Agreement is placed on record. The parties agreed to the terms and conditions stipulated therein, and they have signed the settlement agreement voluntarily without any force or coercion. They agree and admit the execution of their signatures to the said settlement agreement which is not disputed by either of the parties or their respective counsels on record. In view of the same, the matter having been settled by way of amicable mutual settlement agreement in the manner known to law, I do not find any legal impediment to dispose of this appeal in view of the settlement agreement - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010723882025 NC: 2026:KHC:43219 MFA No. 8238 of 2025 by both the parties. Accordingly, this appeal stands disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement annexed along with this appeal filed before this Court. 4. Accordingly the original suit- O.S.No.2898/2025 also consequently stands disposed of in accordance with the settlement terms. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30