[2026:RJ-JP:15413] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3200/2026 Khyaliram S/o Babulal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bhuri Dungri, Tan Badagaon, P.s Basdayal, Dist. Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Saini For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 13/04/2026 1. This anticipatory bail application is filed by the accused petitioner u/S 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 155/2025 registered at Police Station Basdayal, District Kotputli-Behror for offences punishable u/S 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 110 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused petitioner is an innocent person and he has nothing to do with the alleged incident and he was not even present at the place of incident. He also submits that the accused petitioner is ready to cooperate in the investigation and no purpose would be served by sending him in custody. Counsel further submits that after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter against some of the accused persons and during the trial, the material witness-Manoj [2026:RJ-JP:15413] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3200/2026] Saini has been examined, who, in his examination-in-chief, has not made any allegation against the accused petitioner. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. As per the contents of the FIR, the allegation against the accused petitioner is of running over a vehicle over Manoj Saini. Manoj Saini is said to have been examined before the trial Court in a trial proceeding against the co-accused after filing of charge- sheet and in his examination-in-chief, he has not made any allegation against the present accused petitioner. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner and in view of the fact that there is no allegation against the accused petitioner in the statement of Manoj Saini, who has been examined by the trial Court in a trial of the co-accused, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Basdayal, District Kotputli-Behror in FIR No. 155/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; [2026:RJ-JP:15413] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3200/2026] (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /68