Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3541 (KAR)

SMT. GOWRAMMA KUMARASWAMY v. SRI K M ANIL KUMAR

WP/7511/2026 · 2026-04-06

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18626 WP No. 7511 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 7511 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GOWRAMMA KUMARASWAMY W/O LATE DR. S. KUMARASWAMY AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, 2. SMT. SHAMANTH K D/O LATE DR. S. KUMARASWAMY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, 3. SRI. S.K. LINGARAJU S/O LATE DR. S. KUMARASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 4. SRI. K.SIDDARAJU S/O LATE DR. S. KUMARASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, 5. SIDDALINGAMMA @ K. SHOBHA D/O LATE DR. S. KUMARASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENT OF MYSORE AT NO. 484, 3RD STAGE, GOKULAM, MYSORE- 570002. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF NO. 484, 3RD STAGE, GOKULAM, Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18626 WP No. 7511 of 2026 MYSORE- 570002. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KENDULI S.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI K M ANIL KUMAR S/O J. MAHADEVU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 15/95, 15TH WARD, VAJAPAYERASTE, BASAVESHWARA BLOCK, K. R. NAGARA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT- 571602 2. SRI. A. PAPANNA S/O LATE ANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, RESIDING ATHINKAL VILLAGE, MYSORE- 570017. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUED A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED ON THE APPLICATION IA NO. 18 FILED U/O 21 RULE 97, AS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN R.A. NO.220/2025 AT ANNEXURE- M, AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18626 WP No. 7511 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 06.04.2026, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE AMM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49