Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010059432026 2026:GAU-AS:4622 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1815/2026 M/S SATISH PRASAD AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI SATISH PRASAD HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT FLAT NO 501, BLOCK A, VISHWANATH APARTMENT, DEVI MANDAP ROAD, PISKA MORE, RATU ROAD, RANCHI- 834005. 2: SATISH PRASAD PROPRIETOR OF M/S SATISH PRASAD HAVING PLACE OF BUSINESS AT FLAT NO. 501 BLOCK-A VISHWANATH APARTMENT DEVI MANDAP ROAD PISKA MORE RATU ROAD RANCHI-834005 VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR REPRESENTED BY SECY., MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, RAILWAY BOARD, RAILWAY BHAWAN, NEW DELHI. 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER N.F. RAILWAY HAVING OFFICE AT MALIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM-781011 Page No.# 2/3 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. Rathi, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K. Gogoi, CGC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 30.03.2026 Heard Mr. D. Rathi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. K. Gogoi, the learned CGC appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that taking into account that the claim so made in the instant writ petition as regards the refund of an amount of Rs. 1,34,50,602/- against the illegal collection of the terminal charges from the petitioners during the period from 2020-2025 would require adjudication of disputed questions of facts, the petitioners would be well advised to approach the Railway Claims Tribunal. Accordingly, the learned counsel submitted that the petitioners would therefore not like to pursue the present proceedings, without prejudice to their right to approach the Railway Claims Tribunal. 3. Taking into account the said submission, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. Page No.# 3/3 4. The withdrawal of the instant writ petition, however, shall not prejudice the petitioners to approach the Railway Claims Tribunal, if so permissible under law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant