- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010476222026 NC: 2026:KHC:42288 CRL.P No. 10304 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10304 OF 2026 BETWEEN: CHANDRAKANTH RAJE URS S/O VASANTHA RAJE URS T, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, PERMANENT R/AT NO. 70/1, NEAR GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, ASWAL HITNEBBAGILU, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL S. NARAYAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BETTADAPURA PS, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107 REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. NAVEEN RAJ URS S/O LATE SHANKAR RAJE URS, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FOR R1) Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010476222026 NC: 2026:KHC:42288 CRL.P No. 10304 of 2026 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO 1. ALLOW THE CRL.P 2.TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER I.E ACCUSED HEREIN IN C.C.NO.732/2025 I.E CR.NO.49/2025 PENDING BEFORE THE 1ST ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C AT PERIYAPATNA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 118(2), 352, 126(2), 118(1), 115(2), 351(2) OF BNS REGISTERED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT POLICE I.E BETTADAPURA P.S. MYSURU DIST. I.E ANNEXURE-D. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before the Court calling in question the proceedings in C.C.No.732/2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 118(2), 352, 126(2), 118(1), 115(2), 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. 2. The learned High Court Government Pleader on instructions and verification of the records would submit that the charges have already been framed and is accepted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010476222026 NC: 2026:KHC:42288 CRL.P No. 10304 of 2026 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though charges have been framed, the dispute is essentially between the brothers of the family, the concerned Court be directed to conclude the proceedings expeditiously. 4. In the light of the issue is of the year 2025, I deem it appropriate to infuse finality into the proceedings with a direction to the concerned Court to dispose the proceedings, within an outer limit of nine months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order, if not earlier. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 98