Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
14.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.53. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (A) 1833 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station case no. 426 of 2026 dated 25.03.2026 under Sections 21(c)/25/27A/29 of the NDPS Act.
And In the matter of : Nasimul Nadab.
……Petitioner. Mr. Sagar Saha Mr. M. Saha
.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Gurudas Mitra Mr. Utsav Dutta
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that the arrested accused persons named the present petitioner and others. This Court specifically confronted the learned advocate as to whether there are any antecedents, whether any call data records communication as also any money trail which connects the present petitioner with the accused persons. Learned advocate for the State submitted that neither the report nor the Case Diary do reflects such materials. Considering the aforesaid, I am of the opinion that petitioner should be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. As such, prayer
2 for prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner namely, Nasimul Nadab is allowed. As such, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner, within a period of ten days, shall make himself available before the Investigating Officer of the case and thereafter, the Investigating Officer of the case, if required, would fix subsequent dates for presence of the petitioner for the sake of investigation. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (A) 1833 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)