- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010126082024 NC: 2026:KHC:40314 RSA No. 339 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 339 OF 2024 (POS) BETWEEN: HARISH SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S 1. RAJARAJESHWARI N S AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, W/O LATE HARISH KUMAR K 2. SUSHMITHA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, D/O LATE HARISH KUMAR K 3. SUPREETH K AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O LATE HARISH KUMAR K 4. JITENDRA GATTI AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, S/O LATE HARISH KUMAR K APPELLANT NO.2 O 4 ARE REPRESETNED BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY, RAJARAJESHWARI N S, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, W/O LATE HARISH KUMAR K ALL ARE R/AT NO. 1-256. HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, VIDYAPURAM, KABAKA POST, PUTTUR TALUK D.K - 574 220. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VARUN SAI Y, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SACHIN B.S, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010126082024 NC: 2026:KHC:40314 RSA No. 339 of 2024 AND: K. SHRIDHARA ACHARYA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O LATE K. BABU ACHARYA, R/O KEVALU HOUSE, KABAKA VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, DK - 574 220. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.10.2022 PASSED IN RA NO.24/2016 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K., (C/C)., DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 6.8.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.129/2016 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PUTTUR, D.K., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER 1. I.A.Nos.1/2026 to 3/2026 are filed to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondent on record. Date of death is not mentioned as to number of days delay in condoning such application. Further, there is a huge delay of 398 days in filing the appeal. 2. The court perused the material on record meticulously. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010126082024 NC: 2026:KHC:40314 RSA No. 339 of 2024 3. On such perusal of the material on record, it is noticed that it is the legal representatives of defendant who is challenging the judgment of the Trial Court wherein the suit was decreed for possession which was confirmed by the First Appellate Court. 4. Taking note of these aspects of the matters, applications are dismissed. As such, whole appeal abates. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as abated. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11