CRWP-369 IN 117 ANANYA STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA 1. Constitutio official resp at the han representati 2. submitted 24.03.2026 (Annexure but the sam thereon. H satisfied i Superintend 3699-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG NYA KUMARI AND ANOTHER Versus TE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS AM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE **** Mr. Suman Beniwal, Advocate Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D ISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been titution of India seeking issuance of a ial respondents No.2 to 3 to protect the e hands of respondents No.4 to sentation dated 24.03.2026 (Annexure At the very outset, learned itted that the petitioners have rec 2026 before the Superintendent o exure P-6) raising their grievances as he same has not yet been considere on. He further submitted that at this fied if appropriate directions are rintendent of Police, SAS Nagar, F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH CRWP-3699-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.04.2026 ...Petitione ersus ...Responden ICE MANISHA BATRA vocate for the petitioners , Sr. DAG, Punjab s been filed under Article 226 of th ce of a writ of mandamus directing th tect the life and liberty of the petitione to 7 and to take action on the nexure P-6). arned counsel for the petitioners ha e recently filed a representation o dent of Police, SAS Nagar, Moha ces as mentioned in the present petitio sidered and no action has been take at this stage, the petitioners would b s are issued to respondent No.2 agar, Mohali to decide the aforesa .2026 titioners ondents of the ting the titioners n their ers has tion on Mohali petition n taken ould be No.2- foresaid AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.06 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-3 representati 3. 4. on behalf o in due cour the course o 5. commentin disposed of aforesaid re within a accordance petitioners, order to pro 06.04.2026 Amit Sharma Whe Whe 3699-2026 -2- sentation filed by the petitioners and ta Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D ehalf of the respondents-State and sub e course. Let a complete set of the pap ourse of the day. In view of the limited prayer enting anything on the merits of t sed of at this stage with a direction said representation dated 24.03.2026 in a period of 15 days from today, rdance with law. Needless to say, ioners, the official respondents would p r to protect their life and liberty. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye and take necessary action thereon. , Sr. DAG, Punjab, has advance notic d submits that the needful will be don the paperbook be supplied to her durin rayer made by the petitioners, witho ts of the case, the present petition ction to respondent No.2 to decide th .2026 (Annexure P-6) of the petitione oday, by passing a speaking order say, if any threat is found to th ould provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No e notice be done during without tition is cide the titioners order in to the curity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.06 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.