Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3539 (CHH)

AMRUDLAL @ DABLU SIDAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRA/9/2026 · 2026-01-14

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2417-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Appeal No. 9 of 2026 Amrudlal @ Dablu Sidar S/o Jailal Sidar, Aged About 32 Years R/o Girhulpali, Police Station Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh C.G. ... Appellant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Of Police Station Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh C.G. ... Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant : Mr. Roshan Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Judgment on Board 15.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. Roshan Dubey, learned Counsel for the Appellant. Also heard Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Government Advocate appearing for SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2026.01.16 11:49:53 +0530 2 the State/Respondent. 2. The present Appeal has been filed by the Appellant against the judgment dated 09.10.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Tract Special Court (POCSO Act), Sarangarh, Session Khand Raigarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh in Special Criminal Case under POCSO Act No.53/2024 whereby, he has been convicted under Section 5(1) r/w Section 6 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo RI for 20 years and fine of Rs.1,000/- with usual default stipulation. 3. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Appellant has filed two Appeals against the same impugned order, one through a learned Counsel appointed under Legal Aid and another through a private learned Counsel. 4. In view of the Appellant having chosen to pursue the Appeal through private Counsel, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Priya