Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3538 (UTT)

JAIPAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1003/2026 · 2026-04-23

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:3002 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/1003/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Hem Chandra Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. According to the petitioner, he is serving as daily wager in Forest Department since 19.07.2020, but his claim for minimum pay scale is not being considered. Thus, feeling aggrieved, petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to pay prevailing minimum pay scale, including dearness allowance to him, as per recommendation of 7th Pay Commission. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has made a representation, which is on record as Annexure-4 to the writ petition, therefore, the competent authority be directed to take decision thereupon. 5. Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection if the petition is disposed of in terms of prayer made by petitioner’s counsel. 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by directing the competent authority to take decision on petitioner’s representation dated 26.02.2026, as per law, within eight weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 23.04.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a1 31bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56 D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.04.23 17:43:25 +05'30'