1 Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010274772013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 34096/2013 Between: 1. S.RASHEEDA BEGUM,, W/O SHAIK REHMATULLAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 8/1146-3, BELLARY ROAD , KADAPA, TOWN, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KADAPA,KADAPA DISTRICT 3. KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER,KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT ,ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent corporation in interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner's property bearing Municipal Door No. 8/1146-31 Bellary Road , Kadapa, without initiation of proceedings under the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation 2 Act, 1955 or the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or any other relevant statutory legislation as illegal, arbitrary, unfair and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 42420 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to disturb petitioner's peaceful possession over the property bearing Municipal Door No. 8/1146-3, Bellary Road , Kadapa, in survey no. 349/3 granted to me under the orders of the 1st respondent Tahsildar vide proceedings dated 25/07/1994 without initiation of proceedings under the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 or the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or any other relevant legislation pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SRINATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 34096 of 2013 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, appearing virtually through online, submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication any further. 2. Recording the same, this Court is of the considered view that no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:24.06.2026 NKA 4 148 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 34096 of 2013 Date: 24.06.2026 NKA