D/L255 25.08.2026 Bpg. Allowed C.R.M. (M) 1381 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Raidighi Police Station Case No.569 of 2024 dated 05.11.2024 under Sections 103(2)/61(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Asad Sk @ Arshad Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Soubhik Mitter Ms. Rajnandini Das Mr. Narattam Acharyya. ...for the petitioner. Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya Ms. Ananya Chakraborty. …for the State. Mr. Rabi Sankar Chatterjee Mr. Anindya Sundar Das Ms. Suva Gayen Ms. Madhurima Dutta. …for the de facto complainant. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is similarly placed as the other accused persons who have been granted bail. Learned advocate for the de facto complainant opposes the prayer for bail. State also opposes the prayer for bail but is unable to refute the contention that the petitioner is not similarly situated as the other accused persons who have been granted bail. 2 In view of the aforesaid, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Asad Sk @ Arshad shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Diamond Harbour, 24 Parganas (South). If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of 24 Parganas (South) without prior permission of the learned trial court. The case was registered on 05.11.2024. As such, the trial court would expedite the proceedings by fixing regular dates for examination of the witnesses. No unnecessary adjournment be granted to any the parties and the trial of the case would continue in spite of any resolution of the local bar. Thus, CRM(M)1381 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3