Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35374 (CAL)

SK MUKTAR HOSSEN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/1852/2026 · 2026-08-14

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.62 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Not Pressed C.R.M. (A) 1852 of 2026 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Kharagpur Town Police Station Case No. 261 of 2026 dated 22.05.2026 under Sections 111(2)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In Re : Sk. Muktar Hossen ... Petitioner. Ms. Minoti Gomes, Mr. Dilip Kumar Shyamal ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Brajesh Jha, APP, Mr. Somnath Adhikary ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that she has received written instructions for not proceeding with the present application for anticipatory bail. Learned advocate for the State is present. In view of the prayer advanced on behalf of the petitioner, the application for anticipatory bail being CRM (A) 1852 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. Let the written instructions submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner be kept with the record. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)