Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35365 (CHH)

SHOEB QAZI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5139/2026 · 2026-09-09

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010257902026 2026:CGHC:39715 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5139 of 2026 Shoeb Qazi S/o Late Gayas Ahmed Qazi Aged About 41 Years R/o Phase -01 House No.07 Street No.- 04 Near T.V. Tower, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary Lobour Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atat Nagar, Nava Raipur District -Raipur (C.G.) 2. Labour Commissioner, Labour Commissioner Office Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Shri G.K. Pandey, Assistant Labour Commisssioner Labour Commissioner Office, Raipur, District -Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anup Majumdar, Senior Advocate along with Ms. Arunima Agase, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Vivek Verma, G.A. For respondent No. 3 : Mr. Saksham Soni, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 10/09/2026 1. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the petitioner has been promoted to the post of Assistant Labour Commissioner and has JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.09.11 11:53:14 +0530 2 been posted at Ambikapur. In view thereof, the present petition has become infructuous. 2. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the subsequent promotion and posting of the petitioner at Ambikapur, the earlier order of transfer dated 30.06.2026 deserves to be quashed. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4. It is not in dispute that during the pendency of the present petition, the petitioner has been promoted to the post of Assistant Labour Commissioner and posted at Ambikapur. In view of the subsequent promotion and posting, the impugned order of transfer dated 30.06.2026 no longer survives for consideration and is accordingly quashed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti