Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3536 (CHH)

SMT VIMLA RATHORE v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6519/2025 · 2026-02-19

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:9141 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6519 of 2025 1 - Smt Vimla Rathore W/o Shri Rajendra Kumar Rathore Aged About 48 Years Working As Teacher (Lb) R/o Ward No. 14, Tahsil And District- Sakti (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Joint Director Education Division Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Sakti, District- Sakti (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Sakti, District- Sakti (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 20/02/2026 1. Learned State counsel submits that grievance of petitioner is against his transfer and posting at Government Middle School, Seepatkala, BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2026.02.23 18:39:46 +0530 2 Block- Malkharoda, District -Sakti under rationalization policy. It is further contention of learned State counsel that under the rationalization policy, State Government has constituted three level Committee i.e. District Level Committee, Divisional Level Committee and State Level Committee for considering grievances of teachers against their posting and transfer under rationalization policy. Petitioner has not submitted any representation before Divisional Level Committee. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to submit representation before the Divisional Level Committee and direction be issued to concerned Committee to take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner within specified time frame. 3. On due consideration of submission of learned counsel for the parties, this petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit representation/appeal before appropriate Committee and if such representation/appeal is submitted, the concerned Committee shall consider and take decision on the appeal/representation submitted by petitioner within period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram