[2026:RJ-JP:10905] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1149/2026 Shweta @ Shilpi W/o Aashanand @ Pande Sharma, Resident Of Panpura, Police Station Tarari, District Bhojpur, Aara, Bihar (At Present Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Ram Saran, CI, SHO Kolwa HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 34/2025 registered at Police Station Kolwa District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1), 238(a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is wife of the deceased. It is submitted that the applicant is in custody ever since 22.12.2025 and that there exist no criminal antecedents against the applicant. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter. It is next submitted that the main accused in the present case are two other persons, namely Ram Sunder and Dharmendra, whereas the applicant is found to be an accomplice qua the abetment of the said offence. It is further submitted that the [2026:RJ-JP:10905] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1149/2026] applicant has not been named in the FIR, and that no specific role has been attributed qua the applicant in the charge-sheet. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application and has submitted that the offence of heinous nature has been committed by the applicant. 4. Investigating officer has also marked his presence in the Court and has submitted that as per the charge-sheet, there exists a motive on part of the applicant towards the commission of the alleged offence, along with the main accused-Dharmendra, with whom the accused-applicant is having illicit relationship. It is further submitted that the said fact is also corroborated by the CDR records which reflect the abetment of the said offence by the accused-applicant. Moreover, it is submitted that the recovery of a car and a mobile had already carried out from the accused. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that an of heinous nature has been committed; that there exists a motive on part of the applicant towards the commission of the said offence; that there is recovery of tangible evidence; that CDR records prima facie reflect the abetment of the alleged offence by the accused- applicant; that the accused-applicant is having illicit relationship with the main accused-Dharmendra, who has fired the gunshot upon the victim-deceased, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without [2026:RJ-JP:10905] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1149/2026] commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed, at this stage. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /30