- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010242722016 NC: 2026:KHC:42522 MFA No. 799 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 799 OF 2016 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MUNNAMMA W/O LATE MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 2. USHA W/O RUPESH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS BOTH RESIDING AT NO. 55/1 DHARMARAYA ROAD, 15TH CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR, YALAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. 3. MAHESH KUMAR S/O LATE MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 55/1 DHARMARAYA ROAD, 10TH CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR, YALAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VASUDEVA MURTHY B.K, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PADMASHREE SHEKHAR DESAI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010242722016 NC: 2026:KHC:42522 MFA No. 799 of 2016 AND: 1. THE MANAGER BAJAJ ALLAINZ GEN INS. CO. LTD., NO. 105/A, CEARZ PLAZA 136, RESIDENCY ROAD, BENGALURU - 23. 2. M/S. VSL INDIA PVT. LTD., NO. 28, CONCORD HOMES KOODLU MAIN ROAD OPP. TO HOSUR MAIN ROAD BENGALURU - 560 058. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; VIDE ORDER DATED 17.08.2021, NOTICE TO R2 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 26.06.2015 PASSED IN MVC NO.6608/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XXII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010242722016 NC: 2026:KHC:42522 MFA No. 799 of 2016 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 is present. 3. It is stated that this appeal is filed against the dismissal of the claim petition in a death case, on the ground that the claimants had not produced any document to show that they were the relatives of the deceased. Though the appeal was filed in the year 2016, the appellants have kept quiet and not get ready with the matter. The matter is listed today, i.e., 10.08.2026, under the caption “For Dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. This clearly shows that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the litigation and no purpose is served in continuing the same. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE AMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17