Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10424 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08.06.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 10424 of 2026 1.A.Muthaiah 2.Petchiyamma 3.Kalai Arasi ... Petitioners Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Elumalai Police Station, Madurai District. (Crime No.145 of 2026) ...Respondents/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 145 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 351(2) of BNS r/w. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10424 of 2026 Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.145 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that due to the family dispute between the parties, the petitioners attacked Karthigai selvi and she sustained injuries and her head. They also trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant, harassed her with filthy language and attacked them with dire consequences. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are in no way connected in the above said incident. They have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Due to previous dispute this false complaint has been lodged by the defacto complainant. Hence, he prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the offences are grave in nature. Due to previous dispute, these petitioners trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and attacked them with dire consequences. The injured was discharged from the hospital. This 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10424 of 2026 petitioners have no previous case. He vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the records. 6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners, there is a family dispute between the parties, the injured was discharged from the hospital, there is no previous case against the petitioner, and also considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Usilampatti, Madurai District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10424 of 2026 at 10.30 a.m., on every Saturday for a period of four weeks, thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. (P D B J) 08.06.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Usilampatti, Madurai District. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10424 of 2026 2.The Inspector of Police, Elumalai Police Station, Madurai District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10424 of 2026 P. DHANABAL, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 10424 of 2026 Date : 08.06.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis