ASHWANI NAIN v. THE STATE (GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR
BAIL APPLN./1566/2026 · 2026-04-22
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3533 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3533 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
BAIL APPLN. 1566/2026 Page 1 of 2
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1566/2026
ASHWANI NAIN
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Tamta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nisha Narayanan, Mr. Vikramaditya Bhaskar, Ms. Sonika Rathore and Mr. Anuj Tomar, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE (GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. SI Santosh Sirohi, P.S.: GTB Enclave, Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R D E R %
22.04.2026
CRL.M.A. 12493/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.
BAIL APPLN. 1566/2026
By way of the present petition filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 45/2026 dated 12.02.2026 registered under sections 65(1)/351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNS’) and section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 ‘(POCSO Act’) at P.S.: G.T.B. Enclave, Delhi. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:21:05
BAIL APPLN. 1566/2026 Page 2 of 2
It is noticed that the prosecutrix has been impleaded as party- respondent No.2 in the matter. This is un-called for. In light of what has been observed by this court in Saleem vs. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr1, respondent No.2 is deleted from the array of party- respondents.
The allegation in the FIR is that the petitioner, who at the relevant time was about 25-26 years of age, has committed offences under section65(1)/351(3) of BNS and section 6 of the POCSO Act against the prosecutrix, who was about 15 years old at that time.
Considering the allegations and the fact that the petitioner has not yet joined investigation, this court is not inclined to allow the present petition; which is accordingly dismissed.
Petition stands disposed-of.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J APRIL 22, 2026/ak
1 2023:DHC:2622 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/04/2026 at 11:21:05