Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35296 (PAT)

Shankar Singh @ Shankar Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./28935/2025 · 2026-02-10

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28935 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2024 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Shankar Singh @ Shankar Kumar Singh Son of Late Nageshwar Singh Resident of Village - Nandu Righa, P.S.- Belaganj, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56868 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2024 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Pintu Singh @ Pawan Kumar Singh S/O Rampukar Singh R/O Vill.- Nandu Bigha, P.S.- Belaganj, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 28935 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 For the Informant : Mr. Pusp Raj. (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56868 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar For the Informant : Mr. Pusp Raj. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 10-02-2026 Heard the parties in both the aforesaid cases. 2. This is the second attempt of the petitioners for grant of regular bail in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 195 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 386 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 27, 25(1-b), 26, 25 of the Arms Act. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28935 of 2025(5) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 3. Learned counsel Mr. Vikram Kumar, on instruction from the learned counsel for the informant has submitted that in the trial, all the witnesses have been examined. 4. In view of the fact that all the witnesses in the trial, have been examined, both the aforesaid applications are dismissed. 5. During the Course of argument, learned counsel for the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 56868 of 2025 has submitted that the petitioner is HIV positive. 6. In view of the aforesaid submissions, since the petitioner of Cr. Misc. No. 56868 of 2025 is a HIV patient, it is expected that the petitioner will file an application before the trial Judge for proper treatment and the trial judge will pass an order in accordance with law for proper treatment. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U