21. BA] SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:2905 BA1 No.449 of 2026 Subroto Roy Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Ms. Reena Rana, learned legal aid counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.229 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Section 420, 468, 467, 471 & 120-B of IPC, P.S. Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has falsely been implicated in the present matter and he is an old aged person suffering from various ailments; he has no criminal history. It is stated that other co- accused persons, namely, Manju Devi and Shashi Ram Murmu have already been granted bail and Satish and Chotu Paswan have compounded their the matter. She further submits that if the applicant may be released on bail, the amount, so described in the account of the applicant, as being the beneficiary of the proceeds will be returned to the complainant and the matter will be settled between the parties. 5. Learned State counsel vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Having heard leaned counsel for the parties, without going into the merits and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Subroto Roy be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned subject to the condition that he shall not withdraw any amount from the bank. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 21.04.2026 Arti