MOHAMMAD YOUSUF KUMAR v. FAROOQ AHMAD QAZI AND ANR.
CCP(S)/62/2022 · 2026-09-29
Rajesh Sekhri
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3529 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3529 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) No. 62/2022 in SWP No. 646/2001
Mohammad Yousuf Kumar
…..Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Mohammad Sameen, Advocate. q
vs
Farooq Ahmad Qazi and Anr. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Zahid Qais Noor, GA.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 29.09.2026
01. Mr. Zahid, learned GA has produced order No. KVIB/132 of 2026 dated 25.09.2026, a perusal whereof reveals that case of the petitioner, who is a Contingent Paid Employee, was examined in the department and found devoid of merit because it is neither covered under the current policy of the Government in vogue regarding regularization of casual other workers notified vide SRO 520 dated 21.12.2017 nor the policy is applicable to KVIB. Order is taken on record.
02. In view of above, present petition does not survives.Contempt is closed.
03.
Disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to assail the consideration
order, if he so desires.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Srinagar 29.09.2026/Sushant
Sr. No.22