14.08.2026 Sl. No.16 Ct. 446/tkm C. R. M. (A) 2141 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Purulia (M) Police Station Case No.99 of 2026 dated 28.03.2026 under Sections 329(4)/115(2)/117(2)/118(1)/109/76/351(2)/3(5) of BNS 2023 And In Re: Ghanashyam Paramanik … … Petitioner Allowed Mr. Supriyo Shasmal Mr. Dilip Kr. Sadhu … … for the petitioner Mr. Aditya Ratan Tiwary … … for the State 1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that there is a land dispute between the parties and that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case. He further submits that the other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail. He submits that noting these facts, pre-arrest bail be granted to the present petitioner. 2. Learned advocate for the State produces the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. Heard the learned Advocates for the respective parties and perused the materials on record, including the injury report. Considering the nature of the injury, the fact that the charge sheet has already been submitted, and that other co-accused persons similarly circumstanced with the petitioner have been enlarged on bail, I am inclined to extend the benefit under Section 482 of the BNSS in favour of the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- 2 with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Purulia and also subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of BNSS 2023. 5. The application being CRM (A) 2141 of 2026 is disposed of. (Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)