DANISH SULTAN DAR v. MANZOOR AHMAD QADRI (FLORICULTURE)
CCP(S)/259/2024 · 2026-09-19
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3528 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3528 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.10 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 259/2024 DANISH SULTAN DAR …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Ms. Heena Baqal, Advocate vice Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Advocate Vs.
MANZOOR AHMAD QADRI ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. G.N. Sofi, Dy. AG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 19.09.2026
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that in view of the subsequent development, whereby the contract has been allotted to somebody else, the instant contempt petition has rendered infructuous. Her statement is taken on record.
2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. The rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge
SRINAGAR: 19.09.2026
“ARIF”