Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35264 (PAT)

Ranjit Biswas and Ors v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./19946/2018 · 2026-01-28

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19946 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4246 Year-2012 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE District- Purnia ====================================================== 1. Ranjit Biswas, S/o Nathu Lal Biswas, 2. Kaushalya Devi W/o Nathu Lal Biswas, 3. Nathu Lal Biswas S/o Late Sidheshwar Biswas @ Sidhu Biswas, 4. Sanjay Biswas S/o Nathu Lal Biswas, All are R/o Village- Begna, P.S.- Mahalgaon, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. State Of Bihar 2. Vineeta Devi @ Binti Devi D/o Laxmi Narayan Biswas, R/o Village- Pothiya, P.S.- Jalalgarh, District- Purnea. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nand Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 4 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 21.02.2018 passed by the Fast Track Court-2, Purnea in Sessions Trial No. 85 of 2017, arising out of Purnea Complaint Case No. 4246 of 2012 whereby and whereunder petition filed under Section 227 Cr.P.C. dated 16.03.2017 was rejected. 3. As per the report of the learned Trial Court, vide letter no. 01/2023 dated 09.01.2023, as well as report of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19946 of 2018(4) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 Office, Sessions Trial No. 85 of 2017, arising out of Purnea Complaint Case No. 4246 of 2012 has been disposed of on 06.08.2019 and the petitioners have already been acquitted. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have already been acquitted and this case has become infructuous, accordingly, prays for disposal of this case. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions of learned counsels for the parties and report of the learned Trial Court, this case is disposed of having become infructuous. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T