Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35263 (CAL)

JITENDAR KUMAR CHOWRASHIA @ JITENDRA KUMAR CHOWRASHIA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1395/2026 · 2026-08-25

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L259 25.08.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (M) 1395 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Jitendar Kumar Chowrashia @ Jitendra Kumar Chowrashia Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Rajat Singh Ms. Sneha Singh. ...for the petitioner. Mr. L. Vishal Kumar Mr. Sanjib Das. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for 1 year 9 months. Majority of the offences complained of are magistrate triable and the petitioner is not the beneficiary of the alleged offences. State has produced the case diary and referred to the role of the petitioner. I find that more than 700 accounts were formulated to aid the offences by the present petitioner. Having considered the role of the present petitioner, I am of the opinion that the petitioner is thickly connected with the offences. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM(M)1395 of 2026 is rejected. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with 2 the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)