1 CGHC010348582026 2026:CGHC:39874 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4573 of 2026 1 - Praveen Kumar Jain S/o Shri Fatehchand Jain Aged About 52 Years R/o New Market Main Road, Ward No. 21, Near Gurudwara Dallirajhara, District Balod C. G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Its Secretary Ministry Of Revenue And Disaster Management Secretariat Capital Complex, Mahanadi, Bhawan Nawa Raipur District Raipur C. G. 2 - The Commissioner, Durg Division Durg District Durg C. G. 3 - The Collector District Balod C.G. 4 - Superintendent Of Police District Balod C. G. 5 - The Sub Divisional Officer (R) Dondi, District Balod C. G. 6 - The Chief Executive Officer, Municipal Council Dallirajhra, District Balod C. G. 7 - Ajay Kumar Kukreja S/o Shri Kanhaiya, Lal Kukreja R/o Blue Star Petrol Pump Dallirajhara, Tehsil Dondi, District Balod, C. G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri BP Sharma and Shri ML Sakat, Advocates. For State/respondent : Shri Shobhit Mishra, Dy GA. S B: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 11/09/2026 1. This Writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- A. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of mandamus do issue calling for all relevant records of case pertaining the petitioners' case from the respondents if this Hon'ble AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.09.11 18:28:14 +0530 2 Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of case. B. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of certiorari do issue setting aside the order dated 18.8.2026 passed by respondent No.2 in Case No.483/B-121/Year 2025-2026 (Praveen Kumar Jain vs Ajay Kumar Kukreja) thereby confirming the order of respondent No.3 in Revenue Case No.202606240100005/ B-121/Year 2025-26 dated 23.6.2026 and in effect pass an order of immediate de- sealing / opening of the lock as the said orders are illegal, arbitrary and usurpation of jurisdiction not vested in them by law and in violation of petitioner's fundamental and constitutional rights under the Constitution of India. C. A writ and/or an order in the nature of writ of appropriate nature do issue directing respondent authorities for consideration of petitioners' application for allotment of subject land in his favour in accordance with law and till then the possessory right of the petitioner be ordered to be protected in the facts and circumstances of the case. D. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts & circumstances of case. E. Cost of the petition may also be awarded. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, including the impugned order, is also aggrieved of the action of the concerned authorities as without any authority of law, the concerned authorities have put a lock on the main gate of the disputed premises and are unauthorisedly claiming possessory title on the basis of an agreement to sell executed in their favour. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage submits that his main grievance which was about action on the part of authorities in locking the main gate of disputed premises has already been redressed and the lock has been removed and as such, he does not want to prosecute this petition any 3 further. However, he submits that a liberty may be reserved in favour of the petitioner to approach this Court in the case of exigency. 4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, liberty as prayed for is reserved in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash