Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35247 (MAD)

M/s Sriayyanarappan Company v. The State Tax officer (ST)

WP/21329/2026 · 2026-06-15

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 21329 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 21329 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 23076 OF 2026 M/s.Sriayyanarappan Company Rep by its Partner Jayakodi Rathinam, No. 79, Naripallm, Sikkanaampatty Po, Omalur, Salem, Tamil Nadu 636309. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Tax Officer (ST) Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, Omalur Assessment Circle. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the Respondent in the order vide GSTIN 33AAWFS1559A1Z5 /2021-2022, dated 22.12.2025 along with Consequential order through FORM GST DRC-07 bearing Ref No ZD331225339374I , dated 22.12.2025 under Section 73 of the act for the financial year 2021-2022, to quash the same. For Petitioner(s): M/s.R.Hemalatha For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21329 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER An order dated 22.12.2025 and its summary are assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice. 2.Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3.The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4.Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned orders are set aside and the matter is remanded for re- consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21329 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5.The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 15-06-2026 Index: No Speaking order Neutral Citation: No MKN To The State Tax Officer (ST) Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, Omalur Assessment Circle. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21329 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY J. MKN WP No. 21329 of 2026 15-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis