LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED v. RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (KARNATAKA) LIMITED,
WP/11251/2026 · 2026-04-10
Sachin Shankar Magadum
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3524 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3524 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20391 WP No. 11251 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 11251 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED A COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HEADQUARTERS AT P.B NO.979, MOUNT POONAMALLEE ROAD MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI-600089 TAMIL NADU.
REGISTERED OFFICE AT L & T HOUSE, NAROTTAM MORARJI MARG BALLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI - 400 001
AND ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT H. NO. 2073/B, 2ND FLOOR 04TH CROSS RD, OPP. 01ST MAIN RD JUDICIAL LAYOUT, YELAHANKA BENGALURU (KARNATAKA) - 560064.
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. JASPREET SINGH GILL …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. UDAYA HOLLA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MANU PRABHAKAR KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (KARNATAKA) LIMITED,
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20391 WP No. 11251 of 2026
A COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT SAMPARKA SOUDHA, DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD RAJAJINAGAR 1ST BLOCK BENGALURU- 560010 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, A.G.A FOR SRI. ANUKANKSHA KALKERI, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS OF COMMERCIAL M.A. NO. 4/2026 PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE LXXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT), SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 06.04.2026 (ANNEXURE-A) ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT EX PARTE / AD INTERIM RELIEF AS PRAYED FOR IN RESPECT OF IA NO.3 TO 5 IN COMMERCIAL M.A. NO. 4/2026 PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE LXXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (COMMERCIAL COURT) WAS NOT GRANTED AND INSTEAD THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED TO 21.04.2026.
AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. Memo is taken on record.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20391 WP No. 11251 of 2026
2. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach, if the need arises. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
ALB List No.: 4 Sl No.: 2