HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP(S) No. 83/2021 in SWP No. 2811/2013 Suman Sharma ….. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Advocate q vs Alok Kumar Commissioner/Secretary School Education Department Jammu .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 29.09.2026 01. In this petition, petitioner herein alleges non-compliance of order dated 11.02.2014. SWP No. 2811/2013 along with connected CMA came to be disposed of on 11.02.2014, whereby the official respondents were directed to consider and take a decision on the representation of the petitioner, preferably within four weeks, in accordance with rules. 02. Compliance report stands filed by the respondent. It is stated that in compliance with the order dated 11.02.2014, respondent has issued Govt. Order No. 502-JK (Edu) of 2025 dated 30.06.2025. The claim of the petitioner has been considered in compliance with the directions (supra) and with the approval of the Council of Ministers, sanction has been accorded to the creation of one supernumerary post of Lecturer in Commerce w.e.f. 09.11.1995 to 30.03.2013 and consequent upon the same, services of the petitioner have been regularised, on notional basis, in the pay scale applicable at the relevant point of time. Sr. No. 43 2 03. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that, though the order dated 11.02.2014 passed by this Court has been complied with by the respondents, however, salary of the petitioner has not been fixed in compliance with Government order dated 30.06.2025. He further states that he has already filed representation before the respondent, the same has not been considered by the respondent till date. 04. Respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with Govt. Order No. 502-JK (Edu) of 2025 dated 30.06.2025, within a period of one month from the date of passing of this order by passing a speaking order thereon. 05. Respondent has implemented the order dated 11.02.2014 in its letter and spirit. The contempt proceedings are accordingly closed, with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of the instant contempt petition, if the cause survives, otherwise. (Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge Jammu 29.09.2026 Riya