CRM-M-41884- IN THE H (219) SANDEEP KUM STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. N *** MANISHA BATR 1. The Section 482 of Bh for grant of anticip registered under S Act (for short “ND Station City Ratia, 2. As pe Vicky was appreh effected from his interrogation, he s petitioner was no NDPS Act was -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH KUMAR @ SIPPI Versus HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Kuldeep Singh Siwach, Advocate Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana *** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh anticipatory bail in case arising out of nder Section 21(b) of Narcotic Drugs rt “NDPS Act”) (Section 27A of NDP Ratia, District Fatehabad. As per the allegations, on 15.06.2026 apprehended and recovery of 6 Gram m his conscious possession. He n, he suffered disclosure statement on as nominated as an accused. Offen was added. Apprehending his arr JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-41884-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.08.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA vocate for the petitioner preferred by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) out of FIR No.142 dated 15.06.2026 Drugs and Psychotropic Substances f NDPS Act added later on) at Police 6.2026, the accused Vakil Chand @ Grams 14 Miligrams of heroin was He was formally arrested. On ent on the basis of which the present Offence under Section 27A of the is arrest, the petitioner moved an M) 2026 nder SS”) 2026 nces olice d @ was On esent f the d an AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-41884- application for gra of Learned Additio 3. It is a falsely implicated accused which can ready to join inve recovery is to be e be given concessio 4. Per c report has argued as he had supplied Rs.10,000/-. The cases of similar n against him. Ther benefit of bail. Th made out for gran of the suppliers an petition does not d 5. This C for the parties at co 6. The sale/supply of con -2026 (O&M) 2 for grant of anticipatory bail, which ha Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad v It is argued by learned counsel for licated in this case on the basis of di ich cannot be considered to be legally in investigation. His custodial interr to be effected from him. It is, therefo ncession of anticipatory bail. Per contra, learned State counsel w rgued that the allegations against the p pplied contraband to the accused Vaki . The petitioner is even otherwise a ilar nature and 01 case under the pro . There are chances of his committing ail. There is no exceptional or extra- r granting the anticipatory bail to the liers and purchasers is also to be trace s not deserve to be allowed. This Court has heard the rival submis es at considerable length. The petitioner is alleged to be i of contraband and had supplied the ich has been dismissed by the Court abad vide order dated 09.07.2026. l for the petitioner that he has been s of disclosure statement of the co- egally admissible in evidence. He is l interrogation is not required. No therefore, argued that he deserves to nsel while relying upon the status e petitioner are serious in nature d Vakil Chand @ Vicky for a sum of ise a habitual offender as 02 more the provisions of IPC are registered mitting similar offences, if extended -ordinary circumstance has been to the petitioner. The large network e traced. It is, thus, argued that the ubmissions made by learned counsel be involved in the business of d the same to the co-accused Vakil ourt been - He is No es to tatus ature m of more tered nded been k t the unsel s of akil AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-41884- Chand. He is inv eliciting informati recovery of the sa suppliers, custodia nascent stage. It granted in excepti safety of pre-arre knowledge. In ca Investigating Agen adversely effectin order of anticipa procedure of crim law that the powe in extra-ordinary taking into conside conviction may en circumstance is, h For the purpose interrogation of t discussed facts, th deserve to be allow -2026 (O&M) 3 is involved in 02 other cases of simil ormation as to the identity of other per the sale proceeds as well as for trac ustodial interrogation of the petitione ge. It is well settled that anticipator xceptional circumstances only as a p arrest bail would certainly not dis In case custodial interrogation of th g Agency, that shall leave many glarin ffecting the investigation. The Court ticipatory bail does not operate as f criminal cases by the trial Court. It powers for grant of pre-arrest bail ar inary and exceptional circumstances onsideration the nature of the accusati ay entail. In the instant case, no such e is, however, made out from the ple rpose of conducting thorough and p n of the petitioner is must. Taking cts, this Court is of the considered opi e allowed. Accordingly, the same is d f similar nature. For the purpose of her persons involved in the trade, for or tracing the entire network of the titioner is must. The case is at its ipatory bail to an accused can be as a person couched in comparative ot disclose all the facts within his of the petitioner is denied to the glaring loopholes and gaps, thereby Court is also required to see that an ate as inroad in the normal legal urt. It is well settled proposition of bail are to be exercised by the Court ances and with great caution while ccusation and the sentence which the o such exceptional or extra-ordinary the pleas as taken by the petitioner. and proper investigation custodial aking into consideration the above red opinion that the petition does not e is dismissed. se of e, for f the at its n be ative n his the reby at an legal n of ourt hile h the inary oner. odial bove s not AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-41884- 7. It is m the purpose of dec on the merits of th 8. Since any is rendered inf 07.08.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 4 It is made clear that any observation of deciding the present petition and t s of the case. Since the main petition has been all infructuous. (MAN Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes Whether reportable:- Yes/No vation made herein above is only for and the same shall have no bearing een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No y for aring n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.08.07 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.