25.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.56 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. Rejected C.R.M. (A) 2752 of 2026 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with English Bazar Police Station Case No. 1811 of 2025 dated 18.08.2025 under Sections 336(2)/337/338/ 336(3)/316(2)/316(5)/341(1)/340(2)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In Re : Omprakash Jaiswal ... Petitioner. Mr. Dhananjay Bnaerjee, Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick, Mr. Mahiul Islam ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, APP, Mr. Amarta Ghose, Mr. Probal Das ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. Learned advocate appearing for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and emphasises on the fact that District Engineer’s signature was forged and sanctioned plan was handed over to the informant. Having considered the nature of the offence which has been committed, I am of the opinion that this is not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the present petitioner. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. 2 Memo of Evidence submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 2752 of 2026, is, thus, dismissed. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)