Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35219 (PNJ)

SANJAY ALIAS SANJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRR/907/2026 · 2026-08-21

Vikram Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 221 CRR-907-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.08.2026 Sanjay @ Sanjay Kumar …Petitioner V/s State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Lajpat Rai Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revision petition itself has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has completed his sentence and he does not wish to address any further arguments. 2. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present revision petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE August 21, 2026 vcgarg Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2026.08.21 14:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document