Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35211 (MAD)

Kannan.K v. The Tahsildar,

WP/19118/2026 · 2026-06-08

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 19118 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 19118 of 2026 Kannan.K S/o Kannaiyan, 129(1) Center street, Erumpoondi, Tiruvannamalai, Tamilnadu 604 601 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District 2. The Assistant Director Department of Survey and Land Records, Villupuram District ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to survey and fix the boundary stones of the petitioners Land situated in Villupuram Distrct, Ginge Taluk, Se. Pettai Village, in survey no 20/1A, 20/2A1, 22/1A, 22/3, 23/1A, 23/2C, 24/1C in this, an extent of 125.655 Ares i.e 3 acres 10 1/2 cnets as per Challan No 2026/ 0123 / 07/ 00207 dated 20.01.2026. For Petitioner(s): G.Paramasivam For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government Advocate Order This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and fix the boundary stones of the petitioner's land situated in Villupuram District, Gingee Taluk, Se.Pattai Village, in Survey No.20/1A, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19118 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 20/2A1, 22/1A, 22/3, 23/1A, 23/2C, 24/1C, an extent of 125.655 Acres i.e., 3 Acres 10 1/2 cents as per Challan No.2026/0123/07/000207 dated 20.01.2026. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in possession of land and property in Villupuram District, Gingee Taluk, Se.Pettai Village, situated in S.Nos.20 to 24 and he has made an application vide Challan No.2026/0123/07/000207 dated 20.01.2026 to the 1st respondent to survey and fix boundary stones of his land and the same has not been considered by the respondents inspite of repeated representations and hence, he has come forward with the present writ petition. 3. In reply, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner’s application dated 20.01.2026 will be disposed of by the respondents within a period of twelve weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents and also perused the materials available on record. 5. In view of the above, this Court directs the respondents to consider the petitioner’s application dated 20.01.2026 on its own merits, and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19118 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Sk To 1. The Tahsildar, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District 2. The Assistant Director Department of Survey and Land Records, Villupuram District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19118 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. Sk WP No. 19118 of 2026 08-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis