Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35203 (PNJ)

RUCHI SHARMA v. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS

CWP/4956/2026 · 2026-08-13

Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, Sanjiv Berry

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-4956-2026 (O&M) -1- !"#$%#&'('$)*+,-, . ,,,,#"'"'$)#/ 0#/(1( 02 . ,,,,, #(3$)4#)"( *52 ,. . . 52 ,. .0 .0 6, !!"#!!$ % &'( ) ( * + , - ./! 0/ 0. 111 2* +!3 ) - ! 4'5, ,6&() #7#( 8 9 ( ₹10,000/- was deposited as earnest money alongwith the application and as per rules of Punjab Urban Development Authority, the respondents allotted ground floor Flat No.445, Urban Estate Phagwara to the husband of the petitioner at a total price of ₹1,43,000/- to be GYAN CHAND 2026.08.19 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4956-2026 (O&M) -2- paid in 156 installment of ₹1462/- each over a period of 13 years, vide allotment letter dated 05.03.1999 (Annexure P-2). 2.1 The husband of the petitioner deposited 25% as demanded by the respondents and possession was delivered. The husband of the petitioner deposited ₹1,94,000/- including last installment upto 2005 (Annexure P-3). The husband of the petitioner deposited the amount as demanded by respondents from time to time but even after depositing the full amount sale deed was not executed in favour of husband of the petitioner. 2.2 The husband of the petitioner filed complaint NO.75/2012 dated 25.09.2012 against the respondent before learned District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum at Kapurthala. 2.3 In the meanwhile, the husband of the petitioner namely Vivek Sharma expired on 17.05.2014 (Annexure P-4). 2.4 The respondents, before District Consumer Forum disclosed that some of the amount was not deposited and the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum vide order 01.04.2015 dismissed the complaint of the petitioner. 2.5 Petitioner filed appeal before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab but the same was also dismissed vide orders dated 15.05.2017 (Annexure P-6). Aggrieved petitioner, hence filed the present petition. . :( 0; !0!"( )% + ₹ !"!"# $ GYAN CHAND 2026.08.19 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4956-2026 (O&M) -3- %#% % # # & ' $ ( )* +",!"!-. < ) , ( , , ₹$/$/<#+ ()= , ,), ,( ( , * , ,)* , ./! 0/ 0. 111 2* +!3 )- ! / 6 , , ( (<) ,'( ),(>-? %@ ( ( , , 0; !0!" ,,),) * , ./! 0/ 0. 111 2* +!3 )- ! ( , ₹$/$/<#+ " A GYAN CHAND 2026.08.19 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-4956-2026 (O&M) -4- $ %( , , ) ),() '( 0; !0!" , , ,) ) , ₹75,754/-,, , , ) '( ,(, ) ( B- ? %C * ) = ) = , ./! 0/ 0. 1112* +!3 )- ! D (, ₹75,754/- with respondent No.2 within a period of three months from today. 8. It is made clear that in no circumstances any further extension of time for such deposit will be granted to the petitioner. 1 & , , ) .0 . . !"#4*+,-, 3A'(#E F 3AE F GYAN CHAND 2026.08.19 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document