Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3519 (RAJ)

SUMAN KUMARI GHASAL D/O SHRI RAMESHWAR LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CCP/211/2024 · 2026-03-16

Anand Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10902] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 211/2024 Suman Kumari Ghasal D/o Shri Rameshwar Lal, Resident Of Village And Post Kalu Baba Ki Dhani, Hathoz, Via Jhotwara Jaipur (Raj) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary Cum Commissioner, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj., Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Shri Ramesh Chand Meena, Secretary Cum Commissioner, Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj., Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Shri Kanaram, Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan. 4. Jagdish Prasad Meena, District Education Officer, Elementary Education Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Naruka, AAG with Ms. Ritika Naruka, Adv. & Mr. Hamir Shekhawat, Adv. Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG with Mr. Ashutosh Udawat, Adv. & Ms. Renu Chauhan, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 16/03/2026 1. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents, at the outset, submitted that in compliance of order dated 04.05.2018, the respondents have passed the order dated 24.05.2024 and as such compliance has already been made by the respondents. [2026:RJ-JP:10902] (2 of 2) [CCP-211/2024] 2. There is no one to controvert the above factual statements. 3. In view of statement made by learned Additional Advocate General, this contempt petition stands dismissed. 4. Notices stand discharged. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /71