Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35189 (CHH)

NEOSA ADARSH SHIKSHAN SAMITI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4511/2026 · 2026-09-09

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010343702026 2026:CGHC:39614 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4511 of 2026 1 - Neosa Adarsh Shikshan Samiti Through It's Secretary, Smt. Anjana Devi Sahu W/o Shri Ramesn Kumar Sahu, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village - Neosa Tahsil - Beltara, P. S. - Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Director, Department Of Technical Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University, Nevai, Bhilai, District Durg (C.G.) 3 - Pharmacy Council Of India, I - 300, 3rd Floor, Tower - I, World Trade Centre, Nauroji Nagar, New Delhi – 110029. 4 - Chandel Sikshan Samiti, Through Its President Shri Harichandra Singh, S/o Shri Jiyalal Singh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o - Gandhi Nagar, P.S.- Ratanpur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Dr. Giriraj Gadhewal, S/o Tulsi Ram, Aged About 44 Years Presently R/o - Near Shankar Mandir, Vidyanagar, Bilaspur, Police Station - Tarbahar, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri SB Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : Shri Neeraj Choubey, Advocate. For State/respondent : Shri SS Choubey, GA. For Respondent No.3 : Ms. Shweta Rai appears on behalf of Shri Ramakant Mishra, DSGI. S B: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 10/09/2026 1. This Writ Petition involves grievance of the petitioner regarding a new ID Password for B. R. Saw Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Nevsa, Beltara, AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.09.10 18:01:32 +0530 2 District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) run by Neosa Adarsh Shikshan Samiti. 2. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a duly constituted one. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash