Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35189 (CAL)

GAUTAM MEHRA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

WPA/22790/2019 · 2026-08-25

Arjun Ray Mukherjee, Shampa Sarkar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.08.2026 Court No. 12 Item No. 04 Sandip WPA 22790 of 2019 CAN 1 of 2020 (Old No : CAN 4396 of 2020) Gautam Mehra Vs. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Avinash Kankani, Ms. Bidisha Chakraborty …for the UOI. 1. Learned advocate for the respondents submits that the writ petition has become infructuous as the disqualification period is over. 2. None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call. No accommodation is prayed for. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition and the connected application are dismissed for default. 4. The reference is not decided as the writ petitioner does not appear. (Shampa Sarkar, J.) (Arjun Ray Mukherjee, J.)