[2026:RJ-JP:16080] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4742/2026 Rajesh Sharma, Son Of Shri Kailash Chand Sharma, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Plot No. A-46, Shiv Vihar Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner/Defendant Versus 1 Mrs. Poonam Yadav, Wife Of Shri Om Prakash Yadav, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 2, Scheme No. 11D, Behind Government School, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur. 2 Nathulal Meena Son Of Shri Roop Narayan Meena, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Gullar Walon Ki Dhani, Behind Government School, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur. (Deceased During The Suit) 2.1 Mrs. Laxmi Devi, Wife Of The Late Shri Nathulal Meena, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Gullar Walon Ki Dhani, Behind The Government School, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur. 2.2 Pooja Meena, Daughter Of The Late Shri Nathulal Meena, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Gullar Walon Ki Dhani, Behind The Government School, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur. 2.3 Mamta Meena, Daughter Of Late Shri Nathu Lal Meena, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Gullar Walon Ki Dhani, Behind The Government School, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur. 2.4 Raveena Meena, Daughter Of The Late Shri Mahendra Kumar Meena (Daughter In Law), Resident Of Plot No. 1, Gullar Walon Ki Dhani, Behind The Government School, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur. 2.5 Smita Meena, Daughter Of Late Shri Mahendra Kumar Meena, Grand Daughter Of The Late Shri Nathulal Meena, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Gullar Walon Ki Dhani, Behind The Government School, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur. 2.6 Arpit Meena, Son Of Late Shri Mahendra Kumar Meena, Grand Son Of Late Shri Nathulal Meena, Resident Of Plot No. 1, Gullar Walon Ki Dhani, Behind The Government School, Meenawala, Sirsi Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents/Defendants [2026:RJ-JP:16080] (2 of 2) [CW-4742/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Gotecha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sushil Pujari for Mr. Yogesh Pujari HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 17/04/2026 1. Both parties are ad idem that the documents sought to be produced were already on record. 2. Heard. 3. Upon perusal of the record, this Court finds that the learned Trial Court rejected the application on the ground that the documents were not on record, whereas both parties are in agreement that the documents had, in fact, been duly put on record. 4. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to quash and set aside the order dated 13.02.2026 to the extent it pertains to the application under Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC. The matter is remanded to the learned Trial Court for fresh consideration of the application dated 19.08.2025, in accordance with law. 5. With the above observations, the present civil writ petition stands disposed of. 6. All pending applications stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J KRATIKA /1