Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19632 RSA No. 921 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 921 OF 2018 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. HARINI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, D/O. RAMASWAMY, W/O RAMALINGU, R/AT CHATTANAHALLIPALYA VILLAGE, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 570 010.
2.
SMT. PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O. RAMASWAMY,
3.
SRI. SURESH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O. RAMASWAMY,
APPELLANTS NO.2 AND 3 ARE R/AT.NO.1743, GIRIYABOVIPALYA, MYSURU - 570 001. …APPELLANTS (APPELLANT NOS.1 TO 3 ALL ARE ABSENT)
AND:
1.
SMT. S SHANTHAKUMARI AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, W/O. NINGAIAH, R/AT. NO.1569,
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19632 RSA No. 921 of 2018
7TH CROSS, V.V. NAGARA, MANDYA - -571 401.
2.
SRI. RAVI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O. RAMASWAMY, R/AT.1743, GIRIYABOVIPALYA, MYSURU - 570 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G CHANDRAHASA.,ADVOCATE FOR R1;
NOTICE TO R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.09.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.454/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.06.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.281/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL I CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MYSORE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
This Court on 06.03.2026 has issued Court notice to the appellants. Registry of this Court has received a letter dated 27.03.2026 from the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Mysuru stating that the Court notice is served on appellant Nos.1 to 3 as per the report of Bailiffs.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19632 RSA No. 921 of 2018
2. Appellant Nos.1 to 3 have been called out, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
3. The appeal is of the year 2018. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. This Court has no other option than to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- _____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4