1 CGHC010136232025 2026:CGHC:39287 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 77 of 2025 Basant Sahu S/o Shri Sahdev Lal Sahu Aged About 47 Years R/o Indira Chowk (Wrongly Printed As Ind Chowk), Aarang In Front Of R.K. Traders, Tahsil- Aarang, District - Raipur (C.G.) Present Residing- Awadhpuri Colony, Bhatagaon, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - Shri Rajesh Kumar Gupta S/o Manohar Lal Gupta Aged About 58 Years R/o Devendra Nagar,tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Shri Yogesh Kumar Gupta S/o Manohar Lal Gupta Aged About 52 Years R/o Village- Aarang, Tahsil- Aarang, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Arunesh Kumar Gupta S/o Manohar Lal Gupta Aged About 43 Years R/o Devendra Nagar, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.). 4 - Rekha Gupta D/o Manohar Lal Gupta Aged About 70 Years R/o Devendra Nagar, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.). 5 - Rama Gupta D/o Manohar Lal Gupta Aged About 65 Years R/o Devendra Nagar, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.). 6 - Mini Gupta D/o Manohar Lal Gupta Aged About 62 Years R/o Devendra Nagar, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.). 7 - Binni Gupta D/o Manohar Lal Gupta Aged About 60 Years R/o Devendra Nagar, Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.). 8 - Keshav Kumar Gupta S/o Manohar Lal Gupta Aged About 70 Years R/o Aarang, Tahsil-Aarang, District- Raipur (C.G.). 9 - Sunil Kumar Mishra S/o Madan Lal Mishra Aged About 55 Years R/o Aarang, Tahsil-Aarang, District- Raipur (C.G.). AMITA DUBEY Digitally signed by AMITA DUBEY Date: 2026.09.10 12:37:57 +0530 2 10 - Anil Mishra S/o Madan Lal Mishra Aged About 51 Years R/o Aarang, Tahsil-Aarang, District- Raipur (C.G.). 11 - Girja Mishra S/o Madan Lal Mishra Aged About 75 Years R/o Aarang, Tahsil-Aarang, District- Raipur (C.G.). 12 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, R/o Collectorate Premises, District- Raipur (C.G.). ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu and Mr. Aman Tamrakar, Advocates Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Judgment on Board 08.09.2026 1. After arguing for some time learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal with a prayer that as the suit was filed in the year 2025 the learned trial Court may be directed to expedite the trial as early as possible. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the preposition made by learned counsel for the appellant. 3. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. It is expected that the learned trial Court shall decide the suit expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of presentation of the copy of this order. Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge amita