Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35173 (CHH)

M/S B S B K PRIVATE LIMITED v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5115/2021 · 2026-09-09

Shri Santosh Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010334122021 2026:CGHC:39611-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5115 of 2021 M/s B S B K Private Limited Through R.K. Nema, S/o Late Ramlal Nema, Aged About 58 Years, General Manager, M/s Bsbk Private Limited, 4 Th Floor, Surya Treasure Island Mall, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Department of Urban Administration, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, Through The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Executive Engineer ( Pmay And Hfa), Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Anuroop Panda, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1 : Mr. Prasun Kumar Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate General For Respondents No.2 & 3 : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Krushna Ram Mohapatra, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Santosh Sharma, Judge Order on Board Per Krushna Ram Mohapatra , Chief Justice 10.09.2026 1. Heard Mr. Anuroop Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. Prasun Kumar Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General, ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2026.09.10 16:19:56 +0530 2 appearing for the State/Respondent No.1 as well as Mr. Sandeep Dubey, learned counsel appearing for Respondents No.2 & 3.. 2. The Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following reliefs:- “i. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the bills raised by the petitioner and to make payment, which the petitioner is legally entitled. ii. Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. iii. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for withdrawal fo the Writ Petition. 4. Mr. Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for Opposite Party No.1 as well as Mr. Dubey, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Party Nos.2 & 3, do not have any objection to the prayer made. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Santosh Sharma) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra) Judge Chief Justice Anu