Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35166 (KAR)

SHRI. NAGARAJU v. SHRI SOMESH M N

MFA/736/2026 · 2026-07-11

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI & MR.M.N.UMASHANKAR., MEMBER M.F.A.No.736/2026 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.2446/2026) BETWEEN: SHRI.NAGARAJU, S/O KARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT: NO.200, RAMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KAMANAKEREHUNDI ROAD, MYSORE TALUK AND DISTRICT-571 101. … APPELLANT (BY SRI SANATH KUMARA.K.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI.SOMESH.M.N, S/O MARUTHI M.N, MAJOR, R/AT: NO.3208/M-171A, 1ST CROSS, C.V.ROAD, BEHIND MYSORE, LAC AND PAINTS, BANNIMANTAPA, MYSURU-570 015. 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, BAJAJ ALIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO., LTD, NO.1335/A C AND D BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, PANCHAMANTHRA ROAD, Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 INFRONT OF JNANAGANGALA SCHOOL, CHAMARAJAN MOHALLA, KUVEMPUNAGARA, MYSORE-570 015. COLLECTION OFFICE: IN FRONT OF KSRTC BUS STAND, APPAJI TRADERS, 1ST FLOOR, CHAMARAJANAGAR-571 313. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JANARDHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.09.2025 PASSED IN MVC NO.438/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT, CHAMARAJANAGARA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER Learned Counsel for the appellant and the representative of the respondent – Insurance Company are present. 2. A joint memo is on record regarding the settlement between the claimant and the Insurance Company which reflects that the parties have settled for a lumpsum amount of Rs.1,40,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Forty Thousand Only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal in full and final settlement of the claim. The respondent –Insurance 3 Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of the award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest @ 9% per annum from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 3. The memo is accepted and in view of the settlement, this appeal is disposed of. It is directed that the award be prepared no later than two months from today. The amount awarded by the Tribunal is permitted to be withdrawn by the claimant forthwith as per law. The amount that is settled today is permitted to be withdrawn on deposit of the amount by the Insurance Company as per law. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KSR