1 CGHC010346152026 2026:CGHC:39595 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1176 of 2026 Sudhindra Das Vaishnav S/o Ganesh Das Vaishnav Aged About 43 Years Caste- Bairagi, Agriculturist, R/o Madhuban Para, Raigarh, Tahsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.) (Defendant No.2) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ramprasad Chaudhary S/o Late Thandaram Chaudhary, Aged About 52 Years Caste- Aghariya, Agriculturist, President, Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Kokditarai, Registration No. 588, Tahsil And District- Raigarh, R/o Village Uchchbhithi, Tahsil And District- Raigarh, (C.G.) 2 - Jagdish Prasad Patel S/o Late Shyamsundar Patel Aged About 59 Years Caste- Aghariya, Agriculturist And Society Manager, Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Kokditarai, Registration No. 588, Tahsil And District- Raigarh, R/o Village Banjinpali, Tahsil And District- Raigarh, (C.G.) (Plaintiffs) 3 - Ramesh Kumar Moda S/o Purushottam Das Moda Aged About 78 Years President Seth Kirodimal Dharmada Trust, Raigarh, R/o Gaddhi Chowk, Raigarh, Tahsil And District- Raigarh (C.G.) (Defendant No. 3) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raigarh District- Raigarh, (C.G.) (Defendant No. 4) 5 - Fagulal Yadav S/o Nanhuram Yadav Aged About 75 Years Caste- Rawat, Occupation- Agriculture, R/o Village- Kokditarai, Tahsil And District- Raigarh, (C.G.) (Defendant No. 1) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Karan Bahrani, Panel Lawyer SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2026.09.10 14:26:11 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 09.09.2026 1. The present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass an appropriate writ/ order/ suitable direction towards the learned trial court to decide the civil suit bearing no. A/73/2025 pending before the learned 3rd Civil Judge Junior Class District - Raigarh (CG) within stipulated period. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem fit. 10.3 Cost of the petition may also be awarded.” 2. After arguing for some time, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach before the learned trial Court to make prayer for expedite trial of the suit. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Needless to say that if the petitioner had approached before the learned trial court, the same shall be considered by the learned trial Court in accordance with law on its own merits. The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of the suit. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika