- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010495782026 NC: 2026:KHC:39481 WP No. 22805 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 22805 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. S. NAGAMALLIKA W/O SRI.S.SHIVARAM, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.E-82, 5TH CROSS, BEHIND VEENA SCHOOL, LAKSHMIDEVINAGARA, NANDHINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 096. 2. SMT. VAIBHAVI K. W/O SRI.GOKUL RAM SRINIVASAN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.25/1, 17TH CROSS, RANGANATHAPURAM, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VENKATACHALAPATHI S. K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIDHANSOUDHA, BANGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010495782026 NC: 2026:KHC:39481 WP No. 22805 of 2026 2. THE TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009. BOTH THE RESPONDENTS ARE REPRESENTED BY ADVOCATE GENERAL, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B. P. RADHA, AGA ) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER QUASHING THE MUTATION BEARING M.R.NO.H5/2022-23, FOLLOWED BY REJECTION OF INTIMATION (J-SLIP) ISSUED BY JURISDICTIONAL SUB- REGISTRAR, VIDE ORDERS PASSED IN RRT PROCEEDINGS IN RRT(DIS) CR.139 TO 374/2023-24 PASSED THE 2ND RESPONDENT VIDE ORDERS DATED 21/08/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND B AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010495782026 NC: 2026:KHC:39481 WP No. 22805 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. In this writ petition, petitioners are assailing the orders at Annexures-A and B passed by the respondent - Tahsildar, Bengaluru North Taluk, challenging the mutation entries. 3. Learned AGA submitted that the petitioners are having an efficacious remedy under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 4. In that view of the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent authority, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE MCR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34