Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3513 (MAD)

Kamesh v. The State Represented by

CRL OP/8567/2026 · 2026-04-07

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.Nos.8567 & 8579 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.Nos.8567 & 8579 of 2026 Kamesh ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.8567 of 2026 A.Stephen Raj ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.8579 of 2026 Vs. State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, J7, Velachery Police Station, Velachery, Chennai. Crime No.54 of 2026 ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in the above Cr.No.54 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.8567 of 2026 : Mr.Adinarayana Rao For Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.8579 of 2026 : M/s.Manisha L For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.Nos.8567 & 8579 of 2026 ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(B), 25 & 29(1) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.54 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other accused were found in possession of 9.5 kgs of ganja. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and there is no recovery from them. He would further submit that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would reiterate the prosecution case and opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.Nos.8567 & 8579 of 2026 5. Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner and it is a case arising under NDPS Act, this Court is of the view that the petitioners do not deserve anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petitions are dismissed. 07.04.2026 sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, J7, Velachery Police Station, Velachery, Chennai. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.Nos.8567 & 8579 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN.J. sma Crl.O.P.Nos.8567 & 8579 of 2026 07.04.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis