D/L318 17.08.2026 Bpg. Partly Allowed C.R.M. (A) 2564 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Manikchak Police Station Case No.537 of 2025 dated 10.07.2025 under Sections 85/118(2)/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Ajmir Sk & Ors. Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick. …for the petitioners. Mr. Subhendu Sinha Roy Mr. Arka Naha. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in-laws of the matrimonial home of the injured who have been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. The husband of the informant was arrested and has been granted bail. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary and drawn the attention of the Court to the statement of the injured under Section 183 of the BNSS. I have taken into account the overt acts which have been specified in the statement as also the initial information which was 2 furnished to the Police Station. Having considered the locus of all the persons who have approached this Court, I am of the opinion that so far as the petitioner no.1, namely, Ajmir Sk is concerned, his prayer for anticipatory bail should be rejected. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no.1, namely, Ajmir Sk is rejected. So far as the petitioner nos.2 to 5 are concerned, having considered their complicity, their prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioner no.2, namely, Rafikul Sk @ Md. Rafik, petitioner no.3, namely, Rabi Bibi @ Rabiya Bibi, petitioner no.4, namely, Maja Sk @ Juel Hoque and the petitioner no.5, namely, Tahamina Bibi @ Tohomina Bibi shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional court, this order of anticipatory bail will remain in force for a period of six weeks from date. With the aforesaid observations, CRM(A) 2564 of 2026 is partly allowed. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 3 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)