Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3512 (BOM)

UJWALA UTTAMRAO PHULWARE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/10034/2026 · 2026-08-17

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 77-wp-10034-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 77 WRIT PETITION NO. 10034 OF 2026 Ujwala Uttamrao Phulware VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others ... Mr. R.M. Jade, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.B. Girase, Govt. Pleader for the State ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT : 1. The grievance of the Petitioner is that she is superseded while granting appointment against aided Scheduled Caste reserved vacancy. 2. The person who is appointed by superseding the Petitioner is not made party respondent. Even otherwise, the petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy of approaching the school tribunal under section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees Of Private Schools (Conditions Of Service) Regulation Act, 1977. 3. The Writ Petition is therefore disposed of by granting liberty to the Petitioner to approach the School Tribunal. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde 2026:BHC-AUG:36574-DB